80% of Innovation Projects Fail – What Should We Do?

Posted by Stefan Lindegaard on January 3, 2012

3 comments | 1154 reads

I had a recent discussion with a corporate innovation leader who would like to raise their innovation success rate. A staggering 80% of their projects fail. This sounds high, but I think this is very common for many companies and industries.

Whether it is common or not, the innovation failure rate is still too high and companies definitely have room for improvement.

Let’s have a discussion on how to do this. It is a broad topic, but here you get my starters.

First, I would say argue that companies need to apply some kind of pattern recognition mechanism in order to better understand why their innovation projects fail. Doblin, a consultancy company, touches on this in a paper from 2005; On Building an Innovation Competence. In particular, I like this snippet:

“Another key to innovation effectiveness is to track every concept with exceptional diligence and care. Doblin does this through a special digital dashboard, a secure, web-based, innovation tracking system. While we are not fans of central control of innovation, we are big fans of central monitoring, so that somebody knows what the innovation “hit rates” are—which projects succeed and which do not. Collectively these actions will move you to a handful of clear, compelling, valuable and strategic innovation candidates.”

Besides pattern recognition, I would advice companies to look into the very tricky challenge of stopping projects at the right time in order to be able to allocate resources to new or more promising existing projects. They need to find ways of addressing tough questions such as:

When is the right time to stop a project? How do you decide when to stop projects?

Who should make this decision? Should it be experts, executives only or a broader group? Should the decision be kept internally or should you ask external partners or even an external crowd?

How do you capture the insights already gained in the project so that you can use this for other projects? How can you hard-freeze a project without creating a “living dead” project that continues to drain valuable resources?

My starters. The topic is open for discussion.

Republished with author's permission from original post by Stefan Lindegaard.

Stefan Lindegaard

Stefan is an author, speaker, facilitator and consultant focusing on open innovation, social media tools and intrapreneurship.

About Stefan Lindegaard |
Connect:

Categories:

Innovation

1154 reads
Print
Email

3 comments »

Andrew Rudin

January 3, 2012

20% of My Projects Succeed . . .

Since innovation and failure are so closely intertwined, your 20% number did not alarm me, but you framed the discussion in an interesting way. Had you titled the blog "How to Achieve a 20% or Higher Innovation Success Rate," people might stop in their tracks. In some industries, a 20% success rate would be something near nirvana.

The difficulty is in defining 'failure' and 'success.' There are no universal standards, so in similar situations, I like to step back and get clarity. We run into the same things in sales and in IT, where a woefully small percentage of projects are considered 'successful.' Just being 'on time and on budget' doesn't cut it if it doesn't achieve the targeted internal rate of return. And, as any red-blooded CFO knows, there's plenty of SWAG in that calculation. Many times, the 'successful' or 'unsuccessful' badges are assigned for political reasons. There's far less empiricism to the assessments than people are willing to admit.

Clearly,
1. companies cannot be successful without sustainable, ongoing innovation and improvement,
2. failure is an expected outcome
3. great companies have developed ways to manage innovation and to improve the likelihood of achieving targeted financial returns.

Above all, innovation success must be congruent with an organization's capacity for risk, or it will fail. Too much success might mean that too few intelligent risks were taken, and too little exposes poor vetting of project choices. Either outcome could be emblematic of poor risk management, an issue that would be on most CFO's radars.

Bob Thompson

January 3, 2012

Celebrate!

What should we do?

Celebrate! Apply for awards! Write a book!

20% success on innovation "projects" seems high to me. Except I'm not sure what a "project" is. Or as Andy said, what "success" looks like.

For incremental improvements, 20% success may be very low. Can't every product or process be improved just a little bit?

On the other hand, for breakthrough innovations, maybe 1% would be a fantastic success rate if it was truly industry changing.

It seems to me that the trick is to avoid wasting time on ideas that will not turn into value-generating innovations. So, a strong process to review, resource good ideas and kill bad ones quickly seems essential.

Scott Herring

January 4, 2012

Little Bets

One of the best ways to 'succeed' with innovation is to place more small bets. A|B testing and iteration are the allies of innovation. Like previous comments, the definition of failure is relative to the goal - whether creating a new product, service or marketing campaign, taking small bites at the apple gives the business a better chance to mitigate losses or capitalize on successes.

Post new comment

Your name: *

E-mail: *

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Homepage:

Subject:

Comment: *

Input format

Filtered HTML

Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <hr> <table> <tr> <td> <th><ul> <ol> <li> </li><blockquote> <colspan> <rowspan><object>
Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
Images can be added to this post.

Post

Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

Notify me when new comments are posted

All comments

Replies to my comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

What code is in the image?: *

Enter the characters shown in the image.

MarketPlace

Global Customer Experience Management (CEM) Certification Program

[May 30-31, Frankfurt; July 25-26, Hong Kong] An internationally recognized program with proven track record of success - being run for 34 times in 13 cities with attendees from 50 countries, the program is developed based on the U.S. patent-pending Branded CEM Method which aims to drive customer loyalty and brand differentiation with quantifiable business results. Limited offer: USD300 early bird discount.

Join us on May 29th in New York City. Stuart Ryder, SVP, Mobile Research Lead for Ipsos IOTX & Roxana Strohmenger, a leading Forrester analyst, will be in attendance to share best practices and new trends in mobile market research.

[June 12, Sir Francis Drake Hotel] Gregson Siu, Vice President, Ariba Business Operations, Ariba and Bob Thompson, CustomerThink, will be in attendance to share best practices, new trends and latest research to help you develop your customer experience program.

Social Networking and sCRM International Congress in Colombia

[June 25-26, Bogota] Thirteen international thought leaders will present, from different perspectives, the trends, the uses, and the magic - as well as the reality - of Social Networking and how it impacts the way customers are doing/will do business.

Driving ROI With VoC

Walker has identified multiple ways to measure ROI – there is not a one-size-fits-all solution. This paper will address each and conclude with some recommendations to help B-to-B practitioners evaluate which ROI approach will work best for their particular business need.