Daniel O’Sullivan, President and CEO of Interactive Digital - VUI Cloud, is an Entrepreneur and Scientist for technology startups. Dan's undergraduate background is in Electrical Engineering from the Dublin Institute of Technology and he has a Masters in Computer Science from the Polytechnic Institute of New York University. Dan is currently working on innovative ways to use Adaptive Technology to improve efficiency in telecommunications, interactive voice response systems and human-computer interaction. You can reach Dan at dan@vuicloud.com or (631) 680-4307
  • 0 comments 844 reads
    Posted on 2012-04-09

    In my entry titled "Adapting To Caller Skills Increases Success By 1 Percent" http://www.customerthink.com/blog/adapting_to_caller_skills_increases_su..., I wrote on how a client is achieving these results using adaptive technology for the IVR. Today I'd like to quantify the economic benefits associated with the technology.

    Though it varies by geographic region and length of call, agent handled call costs can run about $2.10 per call versus roughly 18 cents per call for the IVR. Doing the math for a premise based call center handling 5M calls per month and converting 1 percent of these calls from "satisfied by an Agent" to "satisfied in the IVR" translates to $1.92 X 1% X 5M = $96,000 per month or $1,152,000/year.

    If on the other hand you are in the business of...

  • 0 comments 760 reads
    Posted on 2012-03-18

    During production trials from March 8, 2012 through March 16, 2012 adaptive technology improved the success rate of automated calls at a client site by 1 percent.

    The client, an unnamed IVR hosting center that supports thousands of ports and dozens of voice applications, segregated out select groups of adaptive and non-adaptive ports for exact performance measurements. The adaptive ports were using Interactive Digital’s Adaptive Audio (www.interactive-digital.com) software.

    As Figure 1 below shows, the call center received a total of 37601 calls on the non-adaptive ports during this period while 37811 were received on the adaptive ones. Of those calls, respectively 10110 and 10545 were considered by the client to be successful. To meet the criteria for success, a caller had to receive information (bank balance, airline flight information, medical claim details etc.) and then either...

  • 0 comments 482 reads
    Posted on 2012-03-16

    Speech is one of the few technologies that has the potential for enhancing telephone self-service. The technology, if used properly, provides motivation for significant upgrading of existing self-service installations. According to ASR News, the speech market will continue to grow at a healthy clip, as illustrated in Figure 1 below.

    Figure 1 - Telephone Self-Service Usage Projections (Billions of Minutes)Figure 1 - Telephone Self-Service Usage Projections (Billions of Minutes)

    In 2010, the total self-service installed base was 8.6M ports worldwide. Figure 2 shows the geographic breakdown for these port deployments.

    ...

  • 0 comments 616 reads
    Posted on 2012-02-22

    The hallmarks of a great self-service voice application are not a whole lot different from that of a great CSR. After all, they serve (or are supposed to serve) the same purpose; your customers need for service and information via telephone. In fact, from the caller’s perspective, engaging with an IVR application is similar to engaging with another human. Callers are, generally speaking, fair and reasonable individuals that are willing to work with a CSR or technology as long as that engagement seems to be working for them.

    Figure 1 shows how an “engagement threshold” exists for the caller when they use an IVR application the first few times. Notice that, though it may be slightly different for Speech and DTMF, there is a significant threshold after 2 - 3 successful interactions by the caller. This critical period is when callers ask themselves whether this automated process will work for them so they don’t have to wait for a CSR, or whether they are wasting their time when...

  • 0 comments 651 reads
    Posted on 2012-02-16

    In an earlier post http://www.customerthink.com/blog/caller_demographics_and_mobile_technol...) and supporting white paper (http://www.customerthink.com/paper/caller_demographics_and_mobile_techno...) I talked about how caller adaptive technology helps the mobile caller experience and the handling of callers of different skill levels. Here, I want to present supporting data for this type of technology - data collected from production trials at various client sites.

    Based on production metrics gathered at various installations,...

  • 0 comments 767 reads
    Posted on 2012-02-11

    More than ever in the past, today’s telephony based voice applications must address large and very diverse calling populations. This audience uses a wide variety of personal, mobile and landline based devices in various modes to access information over the phone.

    • At the end of 2011, there were 6 billion mobile subscriptions, according to the International Telecommunication Union.

    • Mobile subscriptions outnumber fixed lines 5:1 (more so in developing nations)

    • According to the US Census Bureau, the hearing loss population in the US has grown to over 31.5 million

    • Linguists estimate that half of the world’s population is bilingual and there are about 5,000-6,000 different languages spoken in the world today.

    • People of a particular culture or regional dialect may be comfortable with long pauses at the conclusion of a sentence, while people of another may find this demonstrates disinterest, lack of attentiveness and even disrespect.

    ...

  • 0 comments 932 reads
    Posted on 2012-01-19

    In my last entry below, I mentioned some production tests we performed at a client site to measure optimal speaking rates (words per minute) for IVR callers.

    Individual callers speed and accuracy determined whether (and by how much) the audio playback rate was increased or decreased at each IVR script Interaction Point (IP).

    An IP might be as simple as answering yes/no, selecting from a menu, entering a 16 digit credit card number or anything in between.

    A caller that behaved as an expert throughout the call would experience an audio playback speed adjustment profile that went from 100% to 108% and then to a final maximum rate of 112% of normal playback.

    A caller that was not quite an expert, but better than average, experienced an adjustment profile of 100%, 105%, 108% and 110%.

    Callers with less than average speed and accuracy experienced similar adjustment profiles in the opposite direction - 100%, 95%, 92% and so forth.

    For callers of...

  • 0 comments 3,061 reads
    Posted on 2012-01-08

    Apple, Ally Bank, Amazon and Zappos. What do all of these companies have in common?

    Besides great products, innovative marketing strategies and extensive product eco-systems, they all deliver on one more essential ingredient: Exceptional Customer Service.

    Take Apple for instance. I brought my MacBook into the Genius Bar at my local Apple Store a few months ago. Two of the four little feet that keep the MacBook off the desk fell off. Despite the fact that the machine was more than 3 years old and that I did not have an Apple Care service plan, they still took the machine in the back and glued on four new ones for me. And while I had to make an appointment for this, but how about that there’s even such a thing as a Genius Bar in a retail store to accommodate me in the first place?

    I've had many similar first rate customer experiences at Amazon, Best Buy and even some small retailers I have done business with through eBay. Responsive email and chat support, free...

  • 5 comments 2,993 reads
    Posted on 2011-09-16

    Are you losing business with an IVR that does not "listen?"

    My 18 year old son was making a call to buy concert tickets with his new smartphone not so long ago. He looked up the concert's web address on the phone, got the toll free number and rather than give the credit card information online and rack up fees on his data plan, he decided to call. Fairly common these days since many voice apps receive more than fifty percent of their calls from a mobile device.

    At the start of the call, James had a strong enough cell signal and he navigated the IVR call script fairly easily. After a minute though, the signal weakened and he started to get frustrated with the fact that the IVR was not allowing him enough time to respond. It was bad enough that he has to deal with the degraded audio quality and latency issues, but now the IVR is constantly asking him to repeat himself. He's a paying customer with valid credit card, ready to make a purchase and about to get even more...

  • 0 comments 1,351 reads
    Posted on 2011-08-20

    Two independent trials were conducted to determine the effects adaptive technology would have on the performance of the IVR. The voice application used was designed to handle caller inquiries for medical insurance claims, benefits, member coverage and general information. The voice application served primarily members (generally novice users) and providers (generally expert users).

    During Trial 1, Audio Playback Speeds of 100, 110, 114, 117 and 119 were used. During Trial 2, these were changed to 85, 88, 92, 100, 110, 114, 117 and 119. For both trials, the Adaptive Audio speed changing algorithm was used.

    The data in Tables 1 - 6 that follow illustrate production results gathered during these trial periods. These data indicate improvements in IVR Utilization and Average Handle Time (AHT), along with a reduction in the number of errors experienced by callers.

    As Table 1 shows, with adaptation, the mean number of IVR turns was 22.95% (19826/86405), with a 95%...