Thomas Olbrich

Thomas Olbrich

taraneon Consulting Group
Thomas is the co-founder of taraneon Consulting Group, which runs the innovative and award-winning Process TestLab to increase process quality and enable a better process experience.
  • 0 comments 840 reads
    Posted on 2011-11-26

    While our team is still busy with the final analysis of the data from the ‘Quality in Process Management Survey’ we conducted together with the University of Applied Sciences Koblenz over the past few months, let me kick off the discussion with a few general observations:

    Even though business process management still ranks as one of the leading topics for senior management (as it has for the past 10 years or so), the quality of the processes designed, implemented and operated does little to suggest that much attention is paid to delivering something that comes even close to the importance attached to it.

    With just 4% of companies claiming that their processes are ready for operations once they leave the project phase and more than a third of companies having to invest substantial effort to re-work processes to turn them operational, it seems that a lot of the BPM initiatives are a far cry from anything that could be called successful...

  • 0 comments 987 reads
    Posted on 2011-11-12

    So you’ve analysed the situation, isolated the problem and found a way to solve said problem. Job done? Hardly. But that’s where it stops for many business analysts – much to their own frustration. Let’s face it, a process not taken up by the enterprise is in fact not a process, it’s an idea, a design only, regardless of how many days and months of effort went into it and no matter how valuable it could be to the enterprise.

    Selling the process to the enterprise is the prerequisite for your solution even having a chance to solve the problem. The challenge is really to understand the imbalance you’re facing: The problem is there but your solution isn’t.

    First question therefore: Who is your customer? Just as you have (hopefully) made sure that the process you designed is suited to the process customers’ requirements, your solution development process should also address the customer – in this case, the people you stand...

  • 0 comments 651 reads
    Posted on 2011-11-08

    “You do things so much better in Europe” Huh?

    This posting has its origins in a LinkedIn discussion I had with Dick Lee a couple of years ago. As far as I can remember, Dick was at pains to point out that European companies were much more advanced in BPM than companies in the US. At the time I disagreed, pointing out the notable lack of uptake of BPM (in an organizational and/or technical sense) in Europe, the reluctance in particular of middle management to get involved with something that hasn’t produced a thousand success stories at the very least and could therefore be only regarded as a nice but untested concept and last but certainly not least the tendency to cling to process modelling as a way of saying ‘look, I’m already doing something with my processes, what more could you possibly want?’.

    At the time I developed this picture in my mind of two ski jumpers standing at the top of the jump where the US jumper would...

  • 0 comments 513 reads
    Posted on 2011-11-07

    Conference over, jetlag fading, time to reflect on my takeaways from the Building Business Capabilities conference 2011.

    My keywords are: Common sense, business value, processes and business rules, stakeholder participation, architecture and structure, skill development, process testing, capabilities.

    Common sense
    Technology plus the ever increasing number of available methodologies could be regarded as a complete or at least sufficient toolset to deal with any number of process issues companies are facing. In fact the opposite is true: Too many toys to play with distract from what should be done and only lead to confusion. Several speakers pointed out this danger and stressed the importance of applying common sense and a ‘back to the roots’ approach. The role of business analysts and process experts should not predominantly lie in developing new methods but in solving business problems...

  • 0 comments 809 reads
    Posted on 2011-10-18

    Lexmark International, Inc. (NYSE: LXK) today announced the acquisition of Netherlands-based Pallas Athena in a cash transaction, valued at approximately $50.2 million. Upon completion of the transaction, the Dutch company will become a part of Perceptive Software, a stand-alone business unit within Lexmark.

    OpenText – Metastorm
    Bosch – Inubit
    Lexmark – Pallas Athena

    Slowly but surely the small vendors are vanishing. What does this mean for management looking to invest in BPMS? Are we going to see shortlists made up entirely of IBM, Software AG, Oracle? Or is this a sign that we are beginning to see the end of BPMS in its present form and the emergence of something new that includes ACM, social networking components plus rudimentary workflow?

  • 0 comments 528 reads
    Posted on 2011-10-12

    seatbeltWould it be too much to ask that in future all processes come equipped with the following sticker:

    DANGER: This process can seriously damage your wealth

    I’ve always had this a vague picture in my mind of an analogy between wearing a seatbelt while driving and using process testing methods during projects. So I took a quick look at some stats and here’s what I found:

    In Germany we have around 7.8 car accident fatalities per billion kilometres travelled. With an average driving distance of 10000 kilometres per year and driver, this translates into 100.000 drivers of whom 7.8 come to a sad ending. That’s 0.0078%. I’ve also recently read that without seatbelts alone (that’s discounting airbags and other safety measures) the fatality rate...

  • 0 comments 602 reads
    Posted on 2011-09-22

    ebizQ_logoWhile I was working on another blogpost, Peter Schoof put this beauty of a question online on the ebizQ forum:

    “As Niel Nickolaisen says at SearchCIO, The best BPM implementations focus on keeping things simple, "My ‘fix processes before implementing technology’ attitude has influenced how I view such things as BPM systems." So do...

  • 0 comments 1,039 reads
    Posted on 2011-09-16

    UBSIt seemed at first that the news agencies were recycling old stories when reports broke of a major fraud case at UBS. Not so. It’s a new case that has come to light. But while most may find the the volume involved grabbing their attention – $2bn is not exactly small change – the more interesting aspect lies in the apparent failure of the internal control and audit processes. The BBC website today carried a report saying that the alleged offender actually reported his illegal activities himself.

    Now, everything about this story must currently be regarded as speculation including any conclusions we may like to draw from what has been reported.

    But should the reports prove to be true, it must surely be seen as another indication that companies are not paying enough attention to processes...

  • 0 comments 874 reads
    Posted on 2011-09-13

    tardis_2Imagine (if you can) that tomorrow some Process Lords from planet BPM are going to land on Earth – in fact right on the doorstep of your company. OK, so full marks for marketing potential but then comes the difficult bit. They are going to use that time-honoured phrase “Take us to your leader” and naturally they are going to assume that the leader will be head of processes.

    What follows next will probably be similar to a conversation I had last week with a person who – at least by title – is responsible for a decent part of the processes of a major european financial institution.

    Me: So you’re the guy to talk to about processes?

    Him: Well, officially yes....

  • 0 comments 805 reads
    Posted on 2011-09-09

    Social BPM is the topic which currently seems to dominate discussions in the business process community.

    Recent tweetjams on process management had ‘social’ as the most often used buzzword, vendors are actively putting the social sticker on their BPM products, analysts are calling customer integration the do-or-die challenge and everyone is suddenly feeling very good about it all. And yes, a pat on the back is indicated: let us not forget that not so long ago many companies had a policy not to allow messaging systems connected to the outside world and using social networks during office time could lead to severe repercussions for employees.

    But are we really on the road to social processes? It’s easy to say yes when you only provide an obscure definition of ‘social’ or just refer to examples. Does including a Tweet button make a product ‘social’? Is a company Wiki ‘social’? Personally I’d say no, but the way a Wiki is fed and used...