• Print Friendly and PDF
  • Print Friendly and PDF
Bob Apollo

Bob Apollo

Inflexion-Point
Bob is founder of Inflexion-Point - applying a systematic, evidence-based approach to help B2B clients generate customer value, eliminate wasted effort and improve marketing and sales performance. UK-based, Bob previously held senior sales, marketing and C-level global positions in the high-tech sector.
  • 0 comments 665 reads
    Posted on 2012-09-25

    Are your sales and marketing messages targeted at budget makers or budget takers? In most complex, high value sales environments, of course you need to appeal to both. But the marketing messages you need to use - and the sales conversations you need to have - differ dramatically.

    Budget makers vs. budget takers

    Here’s the key difference between the two roles: a budget maker has the power and authority to find the money required for a favoured project, even if a budget does not yet exist. Budget takers, on the other hand, need someone else to have created a budget before they can proceed - and even then they may not get the approval to spend it.

    It’s a critical distinction in any “considered purchase” environment and it’s particularly important for any vendor that is trying to bring a new category of solution to market or seeking to disrupt an existing category, when getting to a budget maker can often be critical to winning the deal.

    A different...

  • 0 comments 722 reads
    Posted on 2012-09-12

    Is your company innovative? Are you customer-focused? Are your solutions best of breed or best in class? What about market-leading? And while we’re about it, how about easy-to-use, scalable and extensible? Perhaps you’re even offering comprehensive or complete solutions? Here’s the problem…

    Who wouldn’t claim these things? More to the point, who isn’t claiming these things? Step back and look around you. Look carefully at the words your competitors are using. Can you spot any similarities? I’d be prepared to bet that there is more common ground than you ought to be comfortable with.

    Familiarity breeds contempt

    Buzzword Bingo 200When everybody claims the same or similar things, two things happen: your prospects...

  • 0 comments 1,045 reads
    Posted on 2012-09-04

    I’ve been called in by a number of clients who believe that they have a bottom-of-funnel sales problem. Their sales opportunities just seem to be piling up and getting stuck in the later stages of the sales pipeline. They imagine that their sales people need help with their closing techniques. But when you dig into it, the problem is almost always somewhere else...

    They have been looking in the wrong place. The real problem typically turns out to be not closing techniques, but opening techniques. A careful examination of the evidence often shows that their sales people have been starting off on the wrong foot, and rushing the all-important early stages of the sales engagement.

    An opportunity to explore

    slowIf a sales opportunity isn’t set up in the right way from the start, it becomes progressively...

  • 0 comments 773 reads
    Posted on 2012-08-29

    If you’re a technology company with a high-value B2B offering that requires an on-going direct sales interaction with your prospects, you have three go-to-market strategy options. At certain stages in your evolution, they might all appear to be equally effective - but it’s hard to implement them all equally well.

    So if your ambition is to lead your market (and if not, why are you in business?), you have to choose - and to execute your chosen option brilliantly. And it turns out that one of these go-to-market strategies performs head-and-shoulders above the rest when it comes to achieving clear and sustainable market leadership.

    Product Leadership

    Most technology companies naturally default to a product leadership strategy, and many never escape from it. They seek to develop product offerings that they position as having a radically new or superior feature set - and a product leadership strategy can appear at first to be highly effective when selling to early...

  • 0 comments 824 reads
    Posted on 2012-08-23

    It’s not a question that comes naturally to many CEOs or, let’s be honest, to most investors. Here’s the problem: for growth phase companies, all other things being equal, the probability of your success is inversely proportional to the size of the market you have chosen to target. At any given point in time, as far as sales and marketing effectiveness is concerned, small target markets are better than large ones.

    The only appropriate answer to the often-heard question “how hard can it be to win just a 1% share of that huge market?” is that it is inevitably far, far harder that you might ever imagine, and likely to be a horrid waste of time and money to boot. Better to chose a market you could dominate, and expand from there once you’ve succeeded.

    Populations are not markets

    Most growth phase companies would describe their goal as becoming a (or even better, the) market leader. But first you have to decide which market you are aiming...

  • 1 comments 973 reads
    Posted on 2012-08-21

    Regular readers will know that I’m no great fan of the traditional BANT (Budget, Authority, Need and Timeframe) approach to sales qualification. It might work for simple transactional sales in which the prospect has an already recognised need they are trying to work out how best to satisfy, but in the complex-sales world most of the readers of this blog work in, BANT is at best a naive approach to opportunity qualification.

    You see, for high-value, considered purchases with lengthy decision-making cycles, multiple stakeholders and the very real chance that the prospect might decide to either do nothing or do something completely different after a long and resource-intensive sales campaign, insisting on BANT qualification can cause you to ignore opportunities you should be pursuing, and chase opportunities you have little chance of winning.

    Ticking the wrong boxes

    Here’s why: by the time you can tick all the “BANT boxes”, your prospect is probably already well...

  • 1 comments 13,357 reads
    Posted on 2012-08-16

    It’s not a very edifying sight, but it happens way, way too often. A prospect gives the faintest acknowledgement of a potential issue, and the impatient (not to say desperate) sales person simply can’t wait to respond by presenting the features, advantages and benefits of their proposed solution in glorious detail. They may even offer to follow up with a costed proposal. All this before the poor bewildered prospect has even come to terms with whether they need to do anything at all. The sales person has pitched their product way too early. This uncomfortable condition is called "premature elaboration" and, trust me, your organisation doesn't want to be seen to be suffering from it.

    I referred to the underlying problem in a recent article “3 critical questions for B2B...

  • 1 comments 1,159 reads
    Posted on 2012-08-09

    Your company is facing an increasingly strong competitor - but you won’t find them listed in any Google search of the key players in your marketplace. But this competitor is playing a powerful and often-undefined role in almost every significant B2B buying decision. And it’s the reason why a growing number of your apparently well-qualified opportunities are ending up with the prospect deciding to “do nothing”.

    Have you recognised the competitor yet? It’s the status quo - and in today’s increasingly risk-averse decision-making climate, where it may be harder than ever before to get approval for discretionary investments, your prospects might think that sticking with the status quo is the safest option open to them. You need to persuade them otherwise. And you need to make the case for change before you make the case for your solution.

    Is the status quo holding you back?

    ...

  • 0 comments 1,075 reads
    Posted on 2012-07-24

    …or at least, that’s the conclusion from a recent article in the Harvard Business Review. In it, the authors of the Challenger Sale reveal some fresh conclusions from the Corporate Executive Board’s ground-breaking research programme into B2B buying and selling behaviours.

    In “The End of Solution Sales”, they conclude that most traditional sales people are spending far too much time with the wrong people - because they tend to seek out friendly informants. Perhaps it’s human nature for most of us to want to avoid disagreement - but as the authors point out, comfortable conversations rarely cause people to change their perspective.

    They go on to suggest that traditional sales training approaches - by stressing the need to find an advocate or coach - may actually be reinforcing the problem, and encouraging sales people to waste their time in what...

  • 0 comments 1,505 reads
    Posted on 2012-07-19

    Homayoun Hatami of McKinsey is one of the co-authors of the widely acclaimed “Sales Growth - Five Proven Strategies from the World’s Sales Leaders”. I shared some of the key findings from the book in one of my latest blog articles - and recently enjoyed the opportunity to catch up with Homayoun and learn more about his experience of using micro-segmentation to uncover market hotspots.

    Micro-segmentation is one of the key strategies in the book, and something Homayoun and his colleagues explored in more detail in "Selling into Micromarkets"...