What It Means To be An Influencer... Online.

Posted by Vanessa DiMauro on October 4, 2011

0 comments | 681 reads

Who knew the topic of online influence could be so exciting and, well, complex? Apparently, Social Media Today did when they assembled a panel for their “Best Thinkers Series” which is a weekly discussion style webinar moderated by expert journalist Maggie Fox. I was fortunate to participate in this event with Megan Berry, marketing manager from Klout. Pulling together a vendor and a practitioner is no easy task – as online influence was discussed as a concept- what does it all mean, straight through to how does one achieve it on and offline.

Here is a summary of my key point of view on online influence…

The first question Maggie asked was about how to define influence. I believe that influence is the power to convene and to tell a good story. Influence is the ability to shift a person or group’s thinking on a particular topic or idea. It is often exerted through the creation of thought leadership but it can also manifest a person or group’s ability to shepherd a new idea to popularity. It most frequently achieved through demonstrable credibility and experience.

The relationship to offline and inline influence is a matter of scale and platform. In the past, prior to social media, one’s personal or professional influence was not fundamentally different than what we see today. An influencer earns credibility by having ideas and experiences that stand the test of time. Yet, in certain circles – especially within the communications professions - influence can be magnified through the social channel. Among social media users, the speed by which information can now flow is unprecedented as outstanding content travels very fast due to the social tools. But it is important to remember, that the topic of the content, in order for it to journey online, needs to be relevant to the social media user base. For example, the nuances of a social business’ trials (e.g. Groupon’s possible IPO) will be amplified far greater than, say, pending M&A activity of a traditional business that doesn’t have a strong social presence. Context matters with online influence.

We then turned to talk about whether groups like Klout (or Peer Index) are accurate representations of actual influence as defined by the ability to impact decisions. Megan Barry gave a good description of how Klout is currently measuring influence and some of the heuristics behind the Klout model. But, there are still nuances to be worked out. While influence scores are a good benchmark of activity, it is still unlikely that they represent an actual measure of true influence as they measure activity and amplification over relevance and impact. For example, if I were to tweet a funny comic or a shocking photo, it is likely that I will inspire far greater amplification of that content (e.g. retweets) than if I were to share a thoughtful piece of content about the strategic business impact of B2B online communities. Now, it is far more likely that I can provide content that helps an organization shape their thinking about communities, than influence the world of humor, however, my online influence score will be more positively impacted by my popular-interest tweet than it would be by my thought leadership article. This is an inherent flaw in most reputation management systems.

Similarly, many a marketing manager has tried to calculate ROI of online influence, but they are often trying to measure the wrong things. Too often the focus on influence ROI is focused on counting up transactions – how many times have I been re-tweeted, how many click-throughs did this link get. These are all interesting indicators of interest, but not necessarily significant indicators of influence as the impact on decision-making can vary widely.

Another discussion highlight was around the topic of how B2B and B2C influence differs online. There are different models for online influence. To amplify (B2C model) and the ability to lead or shape ideas (B2B). For both, experience is a measure of influence but there is a difference in scale and depth for each.

In the B2C market, especially with consumer goods of a low to modest price point, decisions are made in a much more rapid cycle. Therefore, online influence can be largely exerted through the formula of reach + frequency + recent experience. Example, amplification of a computer, a restaurant a vacation spot can all lead to wider adoption. Deep experience or passion play a role, but the ability to shepherd an opinion in a rapid cycle is especially critical.

With complex decisions, online influence matters much less than with transactional decisions as the risk of making a wrong decision is tractable. For example, if I were to made a bad decision on a restaurant dinner, that does not have material impact on my life or profession and therefore I am more likely to act upon a recommendation I find online versus making a enterprise-level software purchase or even choosing a wedding venue.

In the B2B world, reach is less important than depth. Decision-makers rely most heavily on peer referrals when making strategic or expensive decisions. One colleague who has hands-on experience will naturally weigh exponentially more heavily than endorsing tweets of 100 strangers! It is the details of practice and depth of insight that helps shape larger decisions and the public social media marketing tools rarely provide an appropriate platform for these kinds of explorations to occur online.

This points squarely at the reasons why many organizations, having tried their hand in social media marketing on the public channels are now turning to develop their own online communities to service customers. Because the audience is smaller and more selective, there is a greater opportunity to actually reach, engage, collaborate with and influence the people that matter the most to the organization.

Influence goes two ways-companies, through a credible and meaningful social presence can amplify their position in the market and often yield tangible ROI and customers have the power exert influence over a company or an outcome. The sweet-spot of online influence is found in the balance of giving and getting.

Here is the link to listen to the webcast recording and also to see the slides in support of the session.

Republished with author's permission from original post by Vanessa DiMauro.

Vanessa DiMauro

Vanessa DiMauro is CEO of Leader Networks, a research and strategy firm that helps organizations create enterprise-level online communities. She is an Executive In Residence at Babson College, and serves as a Research Fellow for the Society of New Communications. She works with leading companies to create social media strategy and align with operations for positive results.

About Vanessa DiMauro |
Connect:

Categories:

Social Business

681 reads
Print
Email

0 comments »

Post new comment

Your name: *

E-mail: *

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Homepage:

Subject:

Comment: *

Input format

Filtered HTML

Allowed HTML tags: <a> <img> <hr> <table> <tr> <td> <th><ul> <ol> <li> </li><blockquote> <colspan> <rowspan><object>
Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
Images can be added to this post.

Post

Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

Notify me when new comments are posted

All comments

Replies to my comment

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

What code is in the image?: *

Enter the characters shown in the image.

MarketPlace

Global Customer Experience Management (CEM) Certification Program

[May 30-31, Frankfurt; July 25-26, Hong Kong] An internationally recognized program with proven track record of success - being run for 34 times in 13 cities with attendees from 50 countries, the program is developed based on the U.S. patent-pending Branded CEM Method which aims to drive customer loyalty and brand differentiation with quantifiable business results. Limited offer: USD300 early bird discount.

Join us on May 29th in New York City. Stuart Ryder, SVP, Mobile Research Lead for Ipsos IOTX & Roxana Strohmenger, a leading Forrester analyst, will be in attendance to share best practices and new trends in mobile market research.

[June 12, Sir Francis Drake Hotel] Gregson Siu, Vice President, Ariba Business Operations, Ariba and Bob Thompson, CustomerThink, will be in attendance to share best practices, new trends and latest research to help you develop your customer experience program.

Social Networking and sCRM International Congress in Colombia

[June 25-26, Bogota] Thirteen international thought leaders will present, from different perspectives, the trends, the uses, and the magic - as well as the reality - of Social Networking and how it impacts the way customers are doing/will do business.

Driving ROI With VoC

Walker has identified multiple ways to measure ROI – there is not a one-size-fits-all solution. This paper will address each and conclude with some recommendations to help B-to-B practitioners evaluate which ROI approach will work best for their particular business need.