Productive Friction: You Can Do More on LinkedIn Than Collect Links
Seeing and seizing new business opportunities requires a networked brain trust—one that is proactive.
In their new book, The Only Sustainable Edge, John Hagel and John Seeley Brown, make the case for productive friction. In essence they say the interesting and profitable business opportunities increasingly lie outside anyone's own expertise and require a mashup of intellectual capital. In other words, businesses and entrepreneurs need to find others who are at the fringe of their own knowledge and engage in conversation to figure out where potential synergies lie.
Think of it this way, you can't keep sharpening the same saw. Because of change, the challenges that create opportunities can seldom be seen from your current perspective. Nor can they be seized with the tools designed for past problems. Of course, the old problems are not completely gone and the old expertise is not completely obsolete. But, these tools and expertise need to be put in a new context—the context of today's challenges. That is, if one is interested in thriving not just coping.
If this sounds daunting and somewhat stressful, it is. However, it beats the stress and consequences of not facing the present and the immediate future. Hagel and Brown call it productive friction because it requires both or all parties to confront each other to find out what in the other and in their own practices are out of date (friction). And, it involves the discovery of a new perspective, one that could not be seen from either of the old view alone.
The new perspective has the potential of unleashing second-order effects. When Daimler and Olds invented the automobile some would say that they made the horse and buggy obsolete. But that was just the first-order effect. A second-order effect occurred because the new form of transportation enabled the development of suburbs and suburban lifestyle. Before this happened pizza parlors that delivered didn't make sense, neither did shopping malls or lawn mowers.
Here's how the networked brain trust comes into play. Social networking sites are marvelous at managing and foster a lot of weak-tie connections. Take someone on LinkedIn. If they have 80 direct connections, they probably represents people they know and already influence on each other. But, the number of potential connections through ones direct contacts could be well over 1,000,000. In this new pool lie many candidates for productive friction and the spawning of new insights and opportunities.
However, they are only candidate until someone makes a move. Yet, most people don't take action. The majority of LinkedIn users passively collect connections and hope something happens. LinkedIn and other aspects of Web 2.0 can be thought of as sites to log into, or they can be a set of proactive tools that can be used to address pressing business challenges. Creating and benefiting from productive friction is one of them.
6 comments »
Andrew Rudin
Linked In: a victim of success?
John: your point about LinkedIn users collecting connections brings up both a benefit and a drawback of the site:
[b]Benefit:[/b] the "network effect" of expanding your universe of valuable connections.
[b]Drawback:[/b] there isn't a way to ascertain the quality of those connections. They can range anywhere from valuable to even-less-than perfunctory.
That limitation can be frustrating when you're using the site. In fact, today I find that 80-connection users might be more valuable in terms of [i]quality of connections[/i] because they appear more discriminating than those who boast 500+.
It didn't start out that way. A few years ago, a 500+ connection user was someone who was thought to have a valuable network. It's still valuable--but it's important for us not to assume that more than a few of those 500 would even [i]know[/i] the person they're "connected" to. So it's confusing, since it's hard to really understand the relationship behind the connection. Connections are distilled to a simple number. [i]Value[/i] is missing.
I'm not bashing LinkedIn. At its inception, making the site valuable to users meant people building large personal networks quickly. Today, I think the LinkedIn's creators would rather think that [i]connections[/i] mean [i]valuable connections.[/i] But LinkedIn doesn't have a way to effectively enforce that. And I think that the cow is already out of the barn--there are too many people who exploit the site simply to create huge networks.
Wouldn't it be helpful if the next release could provide users a way to designate the [i]type[/i] of links people have to their connections? Where connections could represent a conduit for knowledge or channel for creating productive friction? --or not?
Could that insight be used to address the opportunities you describe?
Vandana Ahuja
The Personal brand..
Great thoughts John..but somewhere one dimension seems untouched.Links and the power of their influence has been discussed and so is the scope of new opportunities.What about the power of the tool for the development of the personal brand.You have talked about the development of your ability to contact thousands of people directly-people who you dont actually know.What about having empowered these thousands of people to contact you.Consumers at times consume products which provide the desired value and are the most visible.Agreed that those with 500 connections may not be doing much with them-but what about the growth and proliferation of the personal brand that these connections eventually deliver?
lasso
Good points
John, good article. My company is in the midst of trying to solve the problem you are describing. Social Media is one but there's also social software (actual pass driving web 2.0/3.0) and what I call "social overload". It's not just that your connections in a single connection is weak but multiply that by 3 different networks you are part of. Almost 90% of social networking users today maintain at least 2 social networks. You see the problem here I am sure. Solution is to clean up the clutter, consolidate and have a single point of network management. On top of that, create actionable environment to promote your brand and I think you have a winner.
Post new comment
MarketPlace
Drive customer loyalty, empower support teams, and reduce costs. Get social.
[Feb 22] Guest speakers from Forrester Research, Allscripts, and CustomerThink will discuss market trends and research on social customer service strategies, as well as proven tactics from the trenches. Join the live webcast on Feb 22 at 10am Pacific (1pm EST).
Global Customer Experience Management (CEM) Certification Program
[March 13-14, Paris] An internationally recognized program with proven track record of success - being run for 33 times in 13 cities with attendees from 50 countries, the program is developed based on the U.S. patent-pending Branded CEM Method which aims to drive customer loyalty and brand differentiation with quantifiable business results. Limited offer: USD300 early bird discount.
10 Steps to a Single Customer View
Linking customer data across department databases and business units improves business intelligence, customer profiling, and customer management. This paper outlines 10 steps to improve the quality of customer contact data, including physical mail, email, and telephone information.
Featured Links
|
The leader in customer relationship management and cloud computing. |
Strategic Roadmap for Digital Marketing Free e-book (no reg required). 15 articles by digital marketing thought leaders. |
CEM Training and Certification Patent-pending methodologies combine the art and science of Customer Experience Management. |
Get your event or resource listed in the MarketPlace, reaching 200,000 business leaders monthly.
For more information, contact
CustomerThink advertising sales.

6 comments | 3318 reads 






