Lead Gen isn’t enough

Do you spend a lot of time collecting names that might be prospects?

Do you spend a lot of money learning how to follow prospects on line, so you can guess where they are in the decision making process?

Has all of this activity substantially increased your ROI?

What you’re forgetting – or ignoring – is that no matter what information the buyer needs, or how often they (and their colleagues) visit your site, or how deftly follow their activity with your ability to track ‘Digital Body Language,’ at the end of the day, you will not be there when they sit down to decide. Nope. The internal decisions that buyers make to choose a solution, to decide to make a change, to select one vendor or solution over another, are off-line. That’s right: you are not there when two department heads have an arguement about which vendor they prefer, or when the tech folks start clamoring to take over a project, or when a partner shows up with a good-enough solution.

The highest closing number I’ve heard – and this number is based on a few very large companies having the funds to set up the technology to follow the ‘Digital Body Language’ from start to finish – is 15%. That means, they are only wasting 85% of their time and effort. Yet because the sales model is so inefficient and typically yields a 7% close, folks think 15% is great. It’s like saying that a doc has to amputate one of your legs, and won’t you be lucky that you’ll still have one leg.

WHAT IS MISSING FROM LEAD GEN?

With all of this talk and money being thrown at ‘lead gen’ what is missing? What’s missing is that it continues to focus on the secondary phase of the buying decision: the solution placement end (OK and the needs assessment – but that only pays lip service to solution placement. You wouldn’t call someone on a whim and ask them about their needs if you had nothing to sell.).

The decision to bring in a new solution is the last thing the buyer does. There are many, many things they must do first:

1. line up the entire Buying Decision Team (which they have not figured out at the beginning of their journey);
2. figure out if they can resolve the problem with known resources (i.e. internally or with a current vendor/software);
3. figure out what has to happen for them to get the appropriate buy-in so that the people and policies won’t be disrupted when something new/foreign comes in;
4. figure out how to meld the old with the new so there is little disruption.

Sales doesn’t do this. Which means, if you’re not using Buying Facilitation® or some form of non-sales decision facilitation method, the best you’ll be able to do is: A. with technology,  monitor activity or place data about your solution; B. with sales techniques and a sales person, gather data, get into relationship, spout solution details, and manage the events.

Do you need to drive prospects to your site so you can gather names and follow them? Of course. But don’t forget the additional steps: contact your prospects; help them discover how they need to manage internal buy-in, and who needs to be involved. Once they figure out how to move forward with buy-in, and the criteria they’ll use to choose a vendor or solution (and you knowing this doesn’t help them decide!), then you’ll be able to sell. Lead gen gets you good prospects. But these prospects are worthless if they don’t buy.

Read my new book Dirty Little Secrets: why buyers can’t buy and sellers can’t sell and what you can do about it. It will help you.

sd

Related posts:

1. Brian Carroll Starts With A Lead Before you can make a sale – either using...
2. Sales As A Spiritual Practice Sales has been focused on placing product. While some...
3. Why is a 90% failure rate ok? As I’m doing the final rewrites on my new...
4. Facilitating Buying Decisions: a definition Recently, I’ve noticed many folks using the term ‘facilitating...
5. How To Listen To A Buyer Until or unless buyers know how to manage the tangles...